|
About Us - Automation Systems
ASKOM has completed more than 400 large and medium automation systems and gained extensive experience in the automation of various technological processes in many branches of the industry. ASKOM's know-how, design, software and organizational solutions developed and proven in the field, a large database of hardware and software tools and a team of competent and experienced staff allow us to undertake virtually any industrial automation task. Areas where we have the greatest experience:
-
Automation
of continuous processes, including those requiring the
implementation of complex, multi-level automatic control systems
having non-standard structures
-
Automation
of discrete processes based on complex sequential control
-
Recipe
control based on the solutions in accordance with the ANSI/ISA-88
(S88) standard
-
Automating
machines
-
The
implementation of complex communication tasks - the interfaces
between various devices / systems, data acquisition systems,
interfaces between automation and MES systems
-
Migration
of control systems based on phased out solutions to the current
hardware and software platforms. ASKOM has extensive experience
especially in system migration from SIMATIC S5 to SIMATIC S7
-
Centralized process monitoring systems - acquisition, archiving,
reporting and presentation on the company network the data sourced
from a variety of control systems
DCS or PLC+SCADA?
ASKOM has extensive experience in designing and implementing
automation systems based both on DCS and solutions utilising
Programmable Logical Controllers ( PLC ) connected to the SCADA
software.
Above all, DCS stands out because it features a common database for
the entire system, unified design environment for the control
stations and the operator layer and the ready-made objects library -
blocks of related control station software and the visualization
system - performing standard functions (measurement, drives control
of various types and automatic regulation systems, etc.). Usually
all or the vast majority of the hardware comes from the DCS provider,
responsible for the integration and seamless interaction of all
system components. This reduces the workload and risks associated
with integrating system components from different vendors, but also
makes DCS more closed and often hinders integration with other
systems (eg, control systems supplied with specialized machines or
MES systems).
The control system implemented with the use of the PLC & SCADA
technology, i.e. using the industrial programmable logic controllers
and process control and visualization software (SCADA) is
characterized by a great configuration flexibility, scalability,
ability to use a wide range of components from different
manufacturers, openness to integration with other systems. With this
approach, the responsibility for integrating all system components
and their proper operation lies with the designer and system
supplier.
In contrast to the DCS system, the drawback of the PLC & SCADA
technology is the operation of two independent process databases,
separate one for industrial controllers, and separate for the SCADA
system. ASKOM solutions are characterized by the operation of a
single common database created using an Excel spreadsheet that
contains all data related both to the controller and the SCADA layer.
A large library of standard controller function blocks and the
corresponding object and stacyjek library of SCADA operator stations
together form a coherent system with functionality comparable to the
DCS.
So, which control system is better? DCS or PLC & SCADA? There is no
universal answer to that question. The answer depends on many
factors, such as: the size of the system, type of process being
controlled, applied electric and measurement devices, the
reliability and safety requirements, integration with other systems
or specific user requirements. Therefore, ASKOM approaches each
system individually, carries out a detailed comparative analysis of
different control system solutions and offers the user an option
that is both technically and economically optimal.
go up
back |
|